charlie_cochrane: (Hattis)
[personal profile] charlie_cochrane
How to make your historical references subtle

Sprinkling (and I do mean sprinkling, no ramming it down the readers’ throats) some references to customs/etiquette throughout your tale is a great way to make an understated historical background to the story. Having your hero rise from his chair when a lady enters the room, ensuring the ladies withdraw after dinner, men wearing hats who then raise them to ladies in the street – these are the sort of things which immediately set your story in that strange world we call the past. And these touches are not as painfully obvious as getting your hero to discuss the sinking of the Titanic with his friend.

Don’t settle for the obvious. Setting the scene can be a great place to showcase your skills and really draw a reader into the story if you’ve done it well; it’s particularly a boon in short stories where each word has to count. But it's also good in longer works too, where it sets the tone for good writing.

I’m using an example from one of my own short stories (Blitz) here, but only because the review at Speak Its Name said “The book has an excellent start - a great first line, first paragraph, which pulls you into the story immediately - tells you where you are, when you are, who’s thinking/talking with a bare minimum of fuss.”

The beer tasted bloody good. Plenty of people were saying that ale now didn’t taste like it had pre-war, that everything had gone downhill, but Adam Jackson couldn’t agree. As far as he was concerned, there was too much looking back with rose tinted spectacles going on. He couldn’t deny the fact that stuff was in short supply, that the things people had taken so much for granted were now luxuries (if they were obtainable at all), but these were all small sacrifices compared to those that some people were making.

I’m really proud of that paragraph and it came about from me seeing my hero, Adam Jackson, as if he was in one of those lovely black and white WWII films and trying to put his thoughts into words as subtly as possible.

I must mention a pet hate of mine, the ‘clunking historical reference’. You know the sort of thing – you’re watching a film, the camera sweeps past a newspaper seller and you see the headline ‘Man lands on the moon’, so we all know it’s 1969. No more references to Neil Armstrong all the rest of the film. Worse than that there’s the stilted conversation between two men at their club about the ‘bally beastly things the Boers are up to’ whose only purpose is to set the time frame as 1901.

Handy Tip number 3: If you really find it impossible to be subtle, then the easiest thing to do is to preface your writing with the words Edinburgh, 1905 which says it all and gets rid of the need for references to men in kilts and Edward VII.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-08 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merith.livejournal.com
I adore an author's subtle hand in a story, whether it's a time/era reference or blooming love or clues to a mystery.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-08 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charliecochrane.livejournal.com
*nods* Oh yes. Less is more for me, every time.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-08 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] essayel.livejournal.com
I'm really enjoying this series. You have a neat way of putting these things into words that are easy to understand.

Actually achieving the effects is another matter of course, but practice makes adequate as they say.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-08 05:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charliecochrane.livejournal.com
:)

I'm glad you're enjoying it. And thanks for the kind words - this sort of combines skills from writing with those from my other job (freelance training) so I'm glad it's working.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-08 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] erastes.livejournal.com
The yanks call that kind of dialogue "As you know, Bob..." dialogue. Because it's used (not so much nowdays in tv shows where the episode begins and one character says to the other "As you know, Bob, the inertial dampeners are failing and we can't get out of the orbit of that sun!"

http://www.tkkenyon.com/fiction-writing-exposition.html

*shudder*

Excellent post, as always.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 08:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charliecochrane.livejournal.com
LOL I had a lump of "As you know Bob" in lessons in Seduction, whihc the editor took a flame thrower to.

You should do a post about over exposition at Macaronis.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 08:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] erastes.livejournal.com
Thank goodness for editors (at times!)

Good idea! Today I'm thinking about blogging about rules!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-08 11:06 pm (UTC)
jl_merrow: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jl_merrow
Ooh, this is very timely indeed!
Hmmm... subtle? I'm not sure I do that very well... *g*

*off to read the other posts I missed*

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 08:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charliecochrane.livejournal.com
You do subtle very nicely. (Although we all have our moments of hammer to crack a walnut - you should see what my editors excise!)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-10 11:51 am (UTC)
jl_merrow: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jl_merrow
Thank you! Actually, I have a story coming out soon called "Subtlety"

Unfortunately, the title is ironic! ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stevie-carroll.livejournal.com
I think exposition in dialogue needs to be there more to tell us about the characters than to remind us about their setting. I've got a lot of trimming to do on my 1980's urban fantasy, but I'd like to keep at least some of this bit:

The conversation over the next game centred on the altogether safer subject of politics. Gran was a lifelong socialist. She could speak at length on her disappointment at both the Labour Party’s failure to supply the first female Prime Minister, and Mrs Thatcher’s failure to live up to ‘how a woman should run this country’. She went on to ask Richard if he was certain that their Prime Minister was entirely human.

Richard had less interest in politics than his Gran. His leanings were basically similar to hers, setting them both at odds with his father, but he had never played any active part in party politics. With less on his mind, he was able to win the next two games by a small margin. Gran would always be there for him to talk to, even if the time for a full unburdening of his soul was a long way off.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charliecochrane.livejournal.com
I'd say keep the Mrs Thatcher stuff, because the way you've put it is more about depicting Gran and her character than establishing a setting.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 06:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] josephine-myles.livejournal.com
These posts have been fascinating (sorry I haven't commented yet). I'm still freaked out by the idea of ever trying to write a "historical", but if I ever do make the attempt, I'll be sure to reread your advice first.

And I know what you mean about "clunking historical references" - they always draw undue attention to themselves.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 08:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charliecochrane.livejournal.com
I'm sure you handle a historical with aplomb - and avoid the 'sore thumb' syndrome. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darthanne.livejournal.com
I'm a big fan of subtle especially in this context. It's far more effective. Readers don't need to be spoonfed, it takes away from the story.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-08-09 08:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charliecochrane.livejournal.com
*nods*

Absolutely. Some people complain about Patrick O'Brian in that he doesn't explain enough about what a topgallant sail or a splice is, but I always think people can look stuff up. :)
Page generated May. 26th, 2025 02:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »